Last year Giovanni Russonello took to the Atlantic magazine to draw a narrow line from Bob Dylan's "Americanarama Festival of Music" showcase and the lack of diversity in the genre overall. ("Why Is a Music Genre Called 'Americana' So Overwhelmingly White and Male?")

I called bullshit in that story and I call it on the recent Wall Street Journal article, "Americana Music Awards Nominees Are Mostly Folky, And White."

In the piece Eric R. Danton takes stock of the current crop of Americana Music Award nominees and concludes that they "skew largely folky, and largely white, with few artists of color among the awards contenders"

The WSJ is hardly a bastion of political correctness, but there it is. The conclusion drawn from both of these articles is plain to see: Americana is a hotbed of bigotry and should be ashamed.

There appears to be a trend to cast Americana as a bastion of white (presumably straight) males. Much of the stereotypes typically reserved for Music Row guards like Toby Keith appear to be blowing back on it's rootier cousin.

I've been covering this music for almost eight years and have been to over 100 Americana and roots music concerts and festivals. I've also been to six Americana Conference and Festivals, where the Americana Awards are presented. I see the artists appearing at concerts, festivals, and accepting those awards and I also see the many emerging artists that contact me hoping to join those ranks of those working musicians.

Males outnumber female performers and, yes, there are more white folks than people of color. So what? Is the conclusion that there's some Americana gatekeeper keeping woman and people of color out of the field? The lazy answer is that they are being kept out, right? Where's the outrage? Where's the Americana occupation?

Or perhaps the answer is more pedestrian: there are fewer women and people of color in Americana because they don't want to be there. Just as hip-hop has few white men and women, and pop music has fewer men, some music styles appeal to segments of society. This isn't societal bigotry, it's diversity in taste.

And, with diversity, there is the freedom for some to choose another direction.

I have been a part of the community and a tireless advocate for a long time. I've met hundreds of fans, musicians and industry folks that love and advocate for this great music. Save for the occasional GRAMMY-nominee (right Linda Chorney?) there is less racial, gender, or sexual bias than any other genre--except for, perhaps, EDM.

There is, however, a bias in musicianship. The music draws from folk and country, as well as blues, Tejano, and zydeco--from the expanse of this country. Other genres have emerged to allow a rich market of styles that appeal to people that self-identify. But, if more black people self-identify with hip-hop or women self-identify with pop, no one sounds the alarm of racism or gender bias on those genres. It's just seen as the way of progress and choice.

A casual survey of Americana might lead you to believe it's chock full of white boys. So what? Is their choice less worthy? More suspect? If there's something about the music that allows males of the caucasian variety to self-identify with it, who's hurt?

Of course, America is not lily white. It's an open community that draws from our rich cultural past--all of it--while forging a future of brave creativity.

Drawing bias from preferences debases the instances of actual bias that corrode our world. Painting those of a any group--black, brown, gay or, yes, even white--as racist or sexist because of a gravitation toward cultural definition is bigotry cloaked in righteousness.

Of course, in America, everyone is entitled to their opinion, no matter how misguided. But I am a member of a great and compassionate community, and I take this as a personal affront. I know these fans. I know these musicians.

In practicality, "there is no such thing as bad publicity"--the statement most often attributed to that master of self-promotion, Phineas T. Barnum--applies here. If Americana and roots music wasn't thriving and growing in influence, it wouldn't be a target for this nonsense. So there's that. But, personally, I believe that those who dare condemn the genre--and, by extension, the people--can stick their kinder and gentler bigotry where the sun don't shine.

originally posted on TwangNation.com

Views: 1490

Comment by Bob Binkley on May 16, 2014 at 7:15am

Well said!

Comment by Shawn Rockefeller on May 16, 2014 at 7:18am

Very well said. I wouldn't have been so nice! Some people just need something to do with their lives...

Comment by Des O'Brien on May 16, 2014 at 7:39am
I'm "Black Irish" and love Americana music, so he can stick that in his pipe and smoke it .. :)
Comment by photo cowboy on May 16, 2014 at 7:41am

i've never heard Toby Keith called Americana

Comment by Corinna Samples on May 16, 2014 at 8:03am

I don't believe this article was calling Toby Keith Americana.  

Comment by Dennis Nyman on May 16, 2014 at 10:09am

Indeed, he said that Americana is the "rootier cousin" of Music Row which does have its share of proud bigots. Nice rant TwangNation. I especially like the phrase, "...bigotry clothed in righteousness."

Comment by Jonathan Lee on May 16, 2014 at 11:44am

My problem with Americana, or more specifically, the Americana Music Association (more commonly known as the Buddy and Jim Show) is that it seems like "Americana", which used to be used interchangeably with "No Depression" and "alt.country", is representative of a type of bland, soulless extension of the music No Depression magazine used to champion. In other words, it largely seems to be a type of music that lacks any real edge. I figured it's because Americana has become a more acceptable term and that the majority of music that's come to fall under that banner is more palatable to the public at large, like Plant and Krauss' highly successful Raising Sand album.

Comment by Darren Smalls on May 16, 2014 at 12:24pm

My problem is that once a wide range of styles were represented on the Americana charts -- bluegrass, cajun, gospel, blues, soul, etc. -- and now it's been winnowed down to white middle-aged singer-songwriters. What's THAT an alternative to?

Comment by Dennis Nyman on May 16, 2014 at 12:58pm

I don't pay attention to awards shows or charts so to me Americana is still all of those alternative styles. It's always been true that what's most popular and wins rewards is often the least interesting. If you're criticizing simply what wins rewards or makes some dubious chart, that's one thing and the put-downs may be justified but to condemn the whole genre out of hand is just wrong in my opinion.

Comment by Jonathan Lee on May 16, 2014 at 10:37pm

I'm not condemning Americana, I'm condemning the redefinition of it. It seems every time I see the words Americana Music Association, a mention of Buddy Miller and Jim Lauderdale is never far behind. I have nothing against either of those artists but I do wonder how they become so closely associated with all things Americana. I believe I preferred the days when the lines were more blurred and the catch phrase was alt.country (whatever that is). "Americana", as it's come to be defined has no balls and bares little to no resemblance to what first drew me to this type of music to start with.

Comment

You need to be a member of No Depression Americana and Roots Music to add comments!

Join No Depression Americana and Roots Music

Sponsors



If you enjoy this site please consider helping us with a small donation!

Don't like PayPal? Mail a check to: No Depression, 460 Bush St., San Francisco, CA 94108


When you shop at Amazon please enter through this search box and No Depression receives a referral fee

Notes

FAQ

Created by No Depression Feb 17, 2009 at 9:06pm. Last updated by No Depression Sep 24, 2012.