My youngest son and I were in the car today and as I often do, I had news radio coming out of the speakers. When you live in California you need it for the traffic reports, brush fire alerts on the really hot days  and the latest comings and goings of the Kardashians. I was kind of half listening and when we hit a spot near the mountains where it all turned to static, we just turned the thing off. "You know", he said, "news today is not like the old days. (He's fifteen.) I mean, all we get anymore is yelling, propaganda and kittens." 

The kid has something there. Those of us who grew up with daily newspapers and Walter Cronkite were pretty fortunate in how we got the latest information. Instead of instant tweets and re-posting Huffington Post headlines from our friends (also known as "people we once knew a long time ago") on Facebook, it used to be that when we got the news it really was researched and well presented. If Cronkite said it, you knew it was true. When people would stand around the water cooler and repeat a story they read in the local paper, it wouldn't be immediately followed with someone saying "don't believe everything you read". 

Now I don't know of any scientific study of the quality and factualness of today's news versus that from the fifties or sixties, but you'd think with all of our modern techno gadgets and  stuff we got, we'd be able to sort the fact from the fiction pretty easily. Yeah...we can usually go with the Wikipedia version of a fact and be happy with that. If you live on the right side of the street you read The Drudge Report and on the left side its HuffPo or Politico. If you need to know who's cheating on whom, you got your TMZ. If you need to know what the weather is going to be, you got an app for it. (Anyone else notice that there are a hundred weather women on television these days for every male? The fruits of the women's liberation movement? A new rampant feminine interest in meteorology? I think not.)

This afternoon I saw a news headline that made my blood boil. 

"Michele Bachmann Thankful No Americans Died In Sikh Shooting"

Now lets take a poll: is this story fact or fiction? I'll wait.

Raise your hand if you thought this was true. Hmmm.....read on:

WASHINGTON—In response to the shooting death of six Sikh worshippers at a temple in Oak Creek, WI yesterday, Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) offered a public expression of her thankfulness that no Americans had been killed in the rampage. "It's a relief and a blessing that not a single American died in this event," Bachmann said of the incident that claimed the lives of six Americans who practice the Sikh faith. "All of us can be grateful for that. Had the gunman targeted a church or synagogue, this violent act could have been much, much worse. There's no telling how many Americans might have died." Bachmann concluded by calling on citizens nationwide to direct all their thoughts and prayers to the family of wounded police lieutenant Brian Murphy, who was shot multiple times while rushing to help victims.

Fiction. The Onion. Satire. 

But....doesn't it sound like something she'd say? Really, it does. Just like if Palin comes out tomorrow morning on Fox (not quite) News and says "I can see Sikhs from my front porch". Or if Donald Trump takes to Twitter and writes "An 'extremely credible source' has called my office and told me that @barrackobama's birth certificate is a fraud." Wait...that's true...he sent it out this afternoon. August 6, 2012. Again Donald? We're back to that old topic? Wikipedia says he was born in Hawaii, so it must be true.

 And now it's time for kittens.

Views: 257

Tags: Cronkite, Easy Ed, Onion, The, Walter

Comment by Derek on August 9, 2012 at 10:49pm

In the old days, it was limited to a few gatekeepers like Walter Cronkite and the New York Times while today, we have the ability to quickly check facts. 

For example, in the 1950s, if the  media said you were a communist, you were a comunist.  In the 1960s, if they said we had only advisors in Vietnam, we only had advisors.  No need for other evidence!  The news was biased then too,  but it was difficult to fact check. 

Sure, today we have bloggers who can say anything without evidence.  But with a few keyboard strokes, you can fact check at snopes.com, factcheck.org (or other similar political fact check sites), and wikipedia.  Heck, if you just google a subject one can usually find many articles, pro and con.  Then you can weigh the evidence and decide. 

It's easy to look to the past and forget that all was not perfect.  The 1950s and 1960s may not have been as pristine as you recollect. 

Comment by denton fabrics on August 10, 2012 at 7:33am

Great kitten video! Who's Michelle Bachmann?

Comment by Easy Ed on August 10, 2012 at 1:36pm

You're in New Hampshire, probably wouldn't know the darling of Fox News.

Comment by Tom Frey on August 14, 2012 at 7:59am

If it wasn't kind of believable it wouldn't be good satire.

I still read newspapers (San Jose Merc) and listen to NPR.  I generally feel my news is about as fact checked as ever.

Comment

You need to be a member of No Depression Americana and Roots Music to add comments!

Join No Depression Americana and Roots Music

Sponsors



If you enjoy this site please consider helping us with a small donation!

Don't like PayPal? Mail a check to: No Depression, 460 Bush St., San Francisco, CA 94108


When you shop at Amazon please enter through this search box and No Depression receives a referral fee

Notes

FAQ

Created by No Depression Feb 17, 2009 at 9:06pm. Last updated by No Depression Sep 24, 2012.